Based on population, a Black person was 3.2x as likely and a Latinx person was 1.6x as likely to be killed by police as a White person in Midland from 2013-20.
We obtained data on 731 Texas police departments.
Loading Map ...
Scorecard at a Glance
Average for 4 Sections: 44%
Scores range from 0-100% comparing cities with 100-250k population. Cities with higher scores spend less on policing, use less force, are more likely to hold officers accountable and make fewer arrests for low-level offenses.
Worse
50th Percentile
Better
| Police Funding: 59% | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Police Budget Cost per Person | ||||
| Misconduct Settlements | ||||
| Fines/Forfeitures | ||||
| Police Presence/Over-Policing (Officers per Population) | ||||
| Police Violence: 37% | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Force Used per Arrest | ||||
| Deadly Force per Arrest | ||||
| Unarmed Victims of Deadly Force per Arrest | ||||
| Racial Disparities in Deadly Force | ||||
Worse
50th Percentile
Better
| Police Accountability: 29% | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Misconduct Complaints Upheld | ||||
| Excessive Force Complaints Upheld | ||||
| Discrimination Complaints Upheld | ||||
| Criminal Misconduct Complaints Upheld | ||||
| Approach to Law Enforcement: 52% | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arrest Rate for Low Level Offenses | ||||
| Homicides Solved | ||||
| Racial Disparities in Drug Arrests | ||||
Key Findings
7 Killings by Police
N/A civilian complaints of police misconduct
No civilian complaints data obtained for this agency.
26,614 arrests made
70% of all arrests were for low-level, non-violent offenses from 2013-19.
Police Funding By Year
$28.9M | $206 per Resident
More Police Funding per Capita than 17% of Depts
Source: US Census Bureau
Funds taken from communities in fines and forfeitures
Total: $32.29M from 2010-18
Source: US Census Bureau
Number of officers per 1k population
160 Officers | 11.4 per 10k Residents
More Officers per Population than 24% of Depts
Source: Federal LEOKA Database
Police Use of Force By Year
More Police Shootings per Arrest than 62% of Depts
Open in New Window
Less-Lethal Force
Used More Force per Arrest than 35% of Depts
103 Incidents | 57 every 10k arrests | ▶-58%
^ Includes batons, strangleholds, tasers & other police weapons
Source: Police Department
Open in New Window
Deadly Force
7 Killings by Police from 2013-20 | 2 every 10k arrests
^ More Killings by Police per Arrest than 82% of Depts
Source: Mapping Police Violence
Deadly Force by Armed Status
14% Unarmed | 43% Did Not Allegedly Have a Gun
Unarmed
Other
Alleged Gun
Vehicle
^ More Unarmed People Killed per Arrest than 75% of Depts
Open in New Window
Police Violence by race
Black
Latinx
API
Other
White
Population of Jurisdiction
People Arrested
People Killed
^ More Racial Disparities in Deadly Force than 60% of Depts
Police Accountability i
Section Score: 29%
Arrests By Year
26,614 Arrests Reported from 2013-19
More Info
Arrests for Low Level Offenses
18,690 Arrests | 22 per 1k residents
^ Higher Arrest Rate for Low Level Offenses than 62% of Depts
Percent of total arrests by type
All Arrests for Low Level Offenses ( 70% )
Drug Possession ( 21% )
Violent Crime ( 5% )
Open in New Window
Homicides Unsolved
31 Homicides from 2013-19 | 11 Unsolved
^ Solved Fewer Homicides than 66% of Depts
Texas Police Department Scores
Rankings are based upon a 0 to 100 percentage scale. Departments with higher scores use less force, make fewer arrests for low level offenses, solve murder cases more often, hold officers more accountable and spend less on policing overall.
Overall Scores for Depts where We Have Obtained the Most Data.
Tap "show more" to see extended list
| Police Department | Score |
|---|---|
| 25. Port Arthur 36% | |
| 24. Austin 37% | |
| 23. Arlington 38% | |
| 22. Amarillo 39% | |
| 21. Pasadena 39% | |
| 20. Tyler 39% | |
| 19. North Richland Hills 39% | |
| 18. Dallas 40% | |
| Police Department | Score |
|---|---|
| * Elgin 45% | |
| * Lockhart 45% | |
| * West University Place 45% | |
| * Crowley 45% | |
| * Victoria 45% | |
| * Benbrook 45% | |
| * Southlake 45% | |
| * Sherman 45% | |
* An asterisk indicates this location did not publish enough data to evaluate. Click below to add data to the Scorecard.
About This Scorecard
This is the first nationwide evaluation of policing in the United States. It was built using data from state and federal databases, public records requests to local police departments, and media reports. While police data is never perfect, and there are additional indicators that still need to be tracked, the Police Scorecard is designed to provide insight into many important issues in policing.
Use this Scorecard to identify issues within police departments that require the most urgent interventions and hold officials accountable for implementing solutions. For example, cities with higher rates of low level arrests could benefit most from solutions that create alternatives to policing and arrest for these offenses. In cities where police make fewer arrests overall but use more force when making arrests, communities could benefit significantly from policies designed to hold police accountable for excessive force. And cities where complaints of police misconduct are rarely ruled in favor of civilians could benefit from creating an oversight structure to independently investigate these complaints.
Here's how to start pushing for change
-
Contact your Mayor and Police Chief, share your scorecard with them and urge them to enact policies to address the issues you've identified:
-
Mayor Jerry Morales
Phone: 432-685-7204
Email: jfmorales@midlandtexas.gov -
Police Chief Seth Herman
Phone: 432-685-7129
Email: sherman@midlandtexas.gov
Advocacy Tip: Texas state legislators are currently considering the George Floyd Act, a bill that would limit police from arresting people for traffic violations and many other low-level, non-violent offenses and end qualified immunity for police. -
Mayor Jerry Morales
-
Look up your state and federal representatives below, then tell them to take action to hold police accountable in your community.
Join a team of researchers, students, data scientists, activists and organizers working to collect, analyze and use data for justice and accountability.
Create data visualizations and content that raises awareness about solutions to the issues identified by the data.
If you have feedback, questions about the project, or need support with an advocacy campaign, contact our Project Lead, Samuel Sinyangwe.
What's Next
Step 1: COMPLETED
Obtain data on 100 California cities. Refine methodology in response to feedback from communities, researchers and local officials.
Step 2: COMPLETED
Expand to every major law enforcement agency in America and include additional indicators such as police budgets and jail incarceration.
Step 3: IN PROGRESS
Inform data-driven solutions nationwide. Update as new federal, state and local data are collected. Track progress and hold cities accountable to results.