Based on population, a Black person was 1.4x as likely and a Latinx person was 0.8x as likely to be killed by police as a White person in Tulsa from 2013-20.
We obtained data on 292 Oklahoma police departments.
Scorecard at a Glance
Average for 4 Sections: 38%
Scores range from 0-100% comparing cities with over 250k population. Cities with higher scores spend less on policing, use less force, are more likely to hold officers accountable and make fewer arrests for low-level offenses.
|Police Funding: 51%|
|Police Budget Cost per Person|
|Police Presence/Over-Policing (Officers per Population)|
|Police Violence: 30%|
|Force Used per Arrest|
|Deadly Force per Arrest|
|Unarmed Victims of Deadly Force per Arrest|
|Racial Disparities in Deadly Force|
|Police Accountability: 8%|
|Misconduct Complaints Upheld|
|Excessive Force Complaints Upheld|
|Discrimination Complaints Upheld|
|Criminal Misconduct Complaints Upheld|
|Approach to Law Enforcement: 64%|
|Arrest Rate for Low Level Offenses|
|Racial Disparities in Drug Arrests|
31 Killings by Police
1,092 civilian complaints of police misconduct
2% were ruled in favor of civilians from 2016-18.
101,737 arrests made
49% of all arrests were for low-level, non-violent offenses from 2013-19.
Police Funding By Year
$121.68M | $301 per Resident
More Police Funding per Capita than 38% of Depts
Funds taken from communities in fines and forfeitures
Total: $85.1M from 2010-18
Number of officers per 1k population
842 Officers | 20.9 per 10k Residents
More Officers per Population than 65% of Depts
Police Use of Force By Year
More Police Shootings per Arrest than 92% of Depts
Used More Force per Arrest than 91% of Depts
946 Incidents | 235 every 10k arrests | ▶-29%
^ Includes batons, strangleholds, tasers & other police weapons
31 Killings by Police from 2013-20 | 2.7 every 10k arrests
^ More Killings by Police per Arrest than 91% of Depts
Deadly Force by Armed Status
19% Unarmed | 55% Did Not Allegedly Have a Gun
^ More Unarmed People Killed per Arrest than 90% of Depts
Police Violence by race
Population of Jurisdiction
^ More Racial Disparities in Deadly Force than 10% of Depts
Total civilian complaints
1,092 from 2016-18 | 2% Ruled in Favor of Civilians
Use of Force Complaints
No Data Found Add Data
Complaints of Police Discrimination
N/A Reported | N/A Ruled in Favor of Civilians
No Data Found Add Data
Alleged Crimes Committed by Police
63 Reported | 14% Ruled in Favor of Civilians
Arrests By Year
101,737 Arrests Reported from 2013-19
Arrests for Low Level Offenses
50,246 Arrests | 18 per 1k residents
^ Higher Arrest Rate for Low Level Offenses than 50% of Depts
Percent of total arrests by type
All Arrests for Low Level Offenses ( 49% )
Drug Possession ( 6% )
Violent Crime ( 6% )
418 Homicides from 2013-19 | 120 Unsolved
^ Solved Fewer Homicides than 37% of Depts
Percent of Homicides Unsolved by Race
Homicides of Black Victims Unsolved ( 18% )
Homicides of Latinx Victims Unsolved ( 8% )
Homicides of White Victims Unsolved ( 10% )
Oklahoma Police Department Scores
Rankings are based upon a 0 to 100 percentage scale. Departments with higher scores use less force, make fewer arrests for low level offenses, solve murder cases more often, hold officers more accountable and spend less on policing overall.
Overall Scores for Depts where We Have Obtained the Most Data.
Tap "show more" to see extended list
|5. Tulsa 38%|
|4. Lawton 41%|
|3. Muskogee 43%|
|2. Oklahoma City 47%|
|1. Broken Arrow 53%|
|* Perry 26%|
|* Lindsay 28%|
|* Sallisaw 29%|
* An asterisk indicates this location did not publish enough data to evaluate. Click below to add data to the Scorecard.
About This Scorecard
This is the first nationwide evaluation of policing in the United States. It was built using data from state and federal databases, public records requests to local police departments, and media reports. While police data is never perfect, and there are additional indicators that still need to be tracked, the Police Scorecard is designed to provide insight into many important issues in policing.
Use this Scorecard to identify issues within police departments that require the most urgent interventions and hold officials accountable for implementing solutions. For example, cities with higher rates of low level arrests could benefit most from solutions that create alternatives to policing and arrest for these offenses. In cities where police make fewer arrests overall but use more force when making arrests, communities could benefit significantly from policies designed to hold police accountable for excessive force. And cities where complaints of police misconduct are rarely ruled in favor of civilians could benefit from creating an oversight structure to independently investigate these complaints.
Here's how to start pushing for change
Contact your Mayor and Police Chief, share your scorecard with them and urge them to enact policies to address the issues you've identified:
Advocacy Tip: We've identified problematic language in this city's police union contract that could make it harder to hold officers accountable. Learn more about this contract and how to change it at Nixthe6.org.
Mayor G.T. Bynum
Police Chief Chuck Jordan
- Mayor G.T. Bynum
Look up your state and federal representatives below, then tell them to take action to hold police accountable in your community.
Join a team of researchers, students, data scientists, activists and organizers working to collect, analyze and use data for justice and accountability.
Create data visualizations and content that raises awareness about solutions to the issues identified by the data.
If you have feedback, questions about the project, or need support with an advocacy campaign, contact our Project Lead, Samuel Sinyangwe.
Step 1: COMPLETED
Obtain data on 100 California cities. Refine methodology in response to feedback from communities, researchers and local officials.
Step 2: COMPLETED
Expand to every major law enforcement agency in America and include additional indicators such as police budgets and jail incarceration.
Step 3: IN PROGRESS
Inform data-driven solutions nationwide. Update as new federal, state and local data are collected. Track progress and hold cities accountable to results.