Skip to Content

We obtained data on 714 Ohio police departments.

  Loading Map ...
 
Police Department Toledo
54% SCORE

Scorecard at a Glance

Average for 4 Sections: 54%

Scores range from 0-100% comparing cities with over 250k population. Cities with higher scores spend less on policing, use less force, are more likely to hold officers accountable and make fewer arrests for low-level offenses.

Worse
50th Percentile
Better
Police Funding:  38%
Police Budget Cost per Person        
Misconduct Settlements        
Fines/Forfeitures        
Police Presence/Over-Policing (Officers per Population)        
Police Violence:  57%
Force Used per Arrest        
Deadly Force per Arrest        
Unarmed Victims of Deadly Force per Arrest        
Racial Disparities in Deadly Force        
Worse
50th Percentile
Better
Police Accountability:  52%
Misconduct Complaints Upheld        
Excessive Force Complaints Upheld        
Discrimination Complaints Upheld        
Criminal Misconduct Complaints Upheld        
Approach to Law Enforcement:  69%
Arrest Rate for Low Level Offenses        
Homicides Solved        
Racial Disparities in Drug Arrests        

Key Findings

Police Funding i

38% -2%

Police Funding By Year

$90.99M  |  271,237 Residents  |  $335 per Resident

More Police Funding per Capita than 45% of Depts

Number of officers per 1k population

580 Officers  |  21.4 per 10k Residents

More Officers per Population than 66% of Depts

Police violence i

57% +5%

Police Shootings

More Police Shootings per Arrest than 45% of Depts

11 Shootings  |  2.6 every 100k arrests

Open in New Window

Less-Lethal Force

Used More Force per Arrest than 77% of Depts

900 Incidents  |  158 every 10k arrests  |  -6%

Open in New Window

Deadly Force

10 Killings by Police from 2013-21  |  1.7 every 10k arrests

^  More Killings by Police per Arrest than 68% of Depts   

Deadly Force by Armed Status

N/A Unarmed  |  40% Did Not Allegedly Have a Gun

Unarmed Other Alleged Gun Vehicle
30%
60%
10%

^  More Unarmed People Killed per Arrest than 1% of Depts   

Open in New Window

Police Violence by Race

Black Latinx N.Am API Other White

Population of Toledo

26%
8%
59%

Toledo Police Dept Demographics

12%
6%
81%

People Arrested

63%
35%

People Killed

50%
50%

^  More Racial Disparities in Deadly Force than 26% of Depts   

Police Accountability i

52% +55%

Total civilian complaints

104 from 2016-20  |  60% Ruled in Favor of Civilians

 

Complaints Not Sustained Complaints Sustained

Use of Force Complaints

17 Reported  |  6% Ruled in Favor of Civilians

Complaints of Police Discrimination

2 Reported  |  0% Ruled in Favor of Civilians

 

Complaints Reported Ruled in Favor of Civilians

Alleged Crimes Committed by Police

N/A Reported  |  N/A Ruled in Favor of Civilians

No Data Found Add Data

Approach to Law Enforcement i

69% -1%

More Info

Arrests for Low Level Offenses

14,873 Arrests  |  12 per 1k residents

^  Higher Arrest Rate for Low Level Offenses than 28% of Depts   

Disparities in Arrests for Low Level Offenses by Race/Ethnicity

Black people were 2.6x more likely and Latinx people were 0.1x more likely to be arrested for low level, non-violent offenses than a white person.

Black Latinx White

Percent of total arrests by type

All Arrests for Low Level Offenses ( 45% )

Drug Possession ( 29% )

Violent Crime ( 10% )

Open in New Window

Homicides Unsolved

338 Homicides from 2013-21  |  131 Unsolved

^  Solved Fewer Homicides than 46% of Depts   

Percent of Homicides Unsolved by Race

Homicides of Black Victims Unsolved ( 47% )

Homicides of Latinx Victims Unsolved ( 67% )

Homicides of White Victims Unsolved ( 17% )

Ohio Police Department Scores

Rankings are based upon a 0 to 100 percentage scale. Departments with higher scores use less force, make fewer arrests for low level offenses, solve murder cases more often, hold officers more accountable and spend less on policing overall.

Overall Scores for Depts where We Have Obtained the Most Data.

Grade Scale Tap "show more" to see extended list

Police Department Score 5YR
5. Cleveland 35% +15%
4. Cincinnati 39% +14%
3. Columbus 39%
2. Akron 43% +3%
1. Dayton 46% +2%
* Shelby 32% -5%
* Euclid 35% -1%
* Westerville 36% -8%
-9%
+6%
-3%
-1%
-1%
+5%
+1%
-3%
-4%
+3%
+3%
+3%
+3%
+3%
+5%
+7%
+9%
+7%
+9%
-1%
-5%
+3%
+3%
-2%
-6%
-8%
-2%
+13%
+3%
+3%
-6%
-7%
+1%
-1%
+13%
-4%
+4%
-3%
+7%
+1%
+2%
+3%
+3%
-6%
+3%
-1%
+2%
+2%
+2%
-7%
+3%
-5%
-1%
+5%
-10%
+2%
+1%
+1%
-2%
-5%
+9%
-2%
-9%
+2%
-1%
+7%
-3%
-3%
+3%
+3%
+3%
+3%
+6%
+8%
+5%
-3%
-2%
+9%
+1%
+5%
-5%
-5%
-2%
-1%
+3%
-4%
-3%
+3%
-2%
+2%
-3%
+1%
+2%
+1%
+1%
-3%
+8%
+8%
+1%
-2%
+1%
-4%
+2%
-7%
-4%
+4%
+5%
-2%
+2%
-1%
+2%
+2%
+1%
+3%
+4%
-1%
+2%
-3%
+1%
-2%
+1%
-3%
-3%
+4%
-2%
-2%
+7%
+1%
-2%
-4%
+9%
-3%
+4%
-1%
-7%
+2%
+3%
+3%
-2%
-7%
+3%
-7%
+5%
-1%
+3%
-13%
-4%
-1%
-12%
-9%
+13%
+3%
-2%
+6%
-19%
+2%
+14%
+7%
+3%
-1%
-2%
-1%
-10%
-1%
-8%
+5%
-1%
+1%
+1%
-15%
+2%
+7%
+4%
Police Department Score 5YR
* Twinsburg 46% +5%
* Rocky River 46% -1%
* Niles 46% -3%
* Roaming Shores 46%
* Woodville 46% -1%
* Mcdonald 46% +1%
* Buckeye Lake 46% -1%
* New Richmond 46% -1%
-6%
-10%
+2%
-1%
-3%
-2%
+6%
+3%
+2%
-1%
+6%
-2%
+5%
-5%
-3%
+4%
+1%
+1%
+2%
-1%
+6%
-4%
+2%
+1%
-1%
-1%
-1%
-10%
-3%
-1%
-2%
+1%
-2%
+1%
+12%
+2%
-1%
+5%
+2%
+1%
-1%
-3%
-1%
+6%
-18%
-1%
+14%
+6%
-1%
-4%
-6%
-3%
+3%
-1%
-11%
-4%
-2%
-2%
-2%
+1%
-3%
-2%
-1%
-3%
-3%
-3%
-3%
+1%
-2%
+2%
+2%
-3%
-3%
+1%
-3%
-8%
-3%
-4%
-7%
+1%
+3%
-4%
+1%
+5%
-8%
+2%
+6%
-6%
-3%
-6%
-1%
-3%
-7%
+2%
-5%
-3%
-2%
-5%
-9%
-1%
+10%
-2%
-4%
+1%
-9%
-2%
-6%
-10%
-1%
-3%
-5%
-9%
-8%
-2%
+8%
+1%
+2%
-2%
-6%
+12%
+1%
-3%
-9%
-4%
-3%
-6%
-7%
-2%
+1%
-1%
+2%
-10%
-11%
-2%
-1%
+7%
-2%
+3%
-3%
+7%
+3%
+10%
+6%
-8%
-1%
-4%
+2%
-3%
+5%

* An asterisk indicates this location did not publish enough data to evaluate. Click below to add data to the Scorecard.

About This Scorecard

This is the first nationwide evaluation of policing in the United States. It was built using data from state and federal databases, public records requests to local police departments, and media reports. While police data is never perfect, and there are additional indicators that still need to be tracked, the Police Scorecard is designed to provide insight into many important issues in policing.

 

Police Scorecard is an independent 501(c)(3) organization, learn more about our team here. If you have feedback, questions about the project, or need support with an advocacy campaign, contact our Founder, Samuel Sinyangwe.

methodology Source Data

 

Use this Scorecard to identify issues within police departments that require the most urgent interventions and hold officials accountable for implementing solutions. For example, cities with higher rates of low level arrests could benefit most from solutions that create alternatives to policing and arrest for these offenses. In cities where police make fewer arrests overall but use more force when making arrests, communities could benefit significantly from policies designed to hold police accountable for excessive force. And cities where complaints of police misconduct are rarely ruled in favor of civilians could benefit from creating an oversight structure to independently investigate these complaints.

 

Here's how to start pushing for change

  • Contact your Mayor and Police Chief, share your scorecard with them and urge them to enact policies to address the issues you've identified:
    Advocacy Tip:  There is problematic language in this city's police union contract that could make it harder to hold officers accountable. Tell your Mayor to re-negotiate the police union contract.
  • Look up your state and federal representatives below, then tell them to take action to hold police accountable in your community.