Skip to Content

We obtained data on 593 Michigan police departments.

  Loading Map ...
 
Police Department * Flint
51% SCORE

* An asterisk indicates that this location has not provided enough data to be included in our rankings. We are still working to obtain comprehensive data from every jurisdiction in the nation.

Scorecard at a Glance

Average for 4 Sections: 51%

Scores range from 0-100% comparing cities with 50-100k population. Cities with higher scores spend less on policing, use less force, are more likely to hold officers accountable and make fewer arrests for low-level offenses.

Worse
50th Percentile
Better
Police Funding:  59%
Police Budget Cost per Person        
Misconduct Settlements        
Fines/Forfeitures        
Police Presence/Over-Policing (Officers per Population)        
Police Violence:  48%
Force Used per Arrest        
Deadly Force per Arrest        
Unarmed Victims of Deadly Force per Arrest        
Racial Disparities in Deadly Force        
Worse
50th Percentile
Better
Police Accountability:  29%
Misconduct Complaints Upheld        
Excessive Force Complaints Upheld        
Discrimination Complaints Upheld        
Criminal Misconduct Complaints Upheld        
Approach to Law Enforcement:  69%
Arrest Rate for Low Level Offenses        
Homicides Solved        
Racial Disparities in Drug Arrests        

Key Findings

Police Funding i

59% -2%

Police Funding By Year

$38.51M  |  94,842 Residents  |  $406 per Resident

More Police Funding per Capita than 86% of Depts

Number of officers per 1k population

99 Officers  |  10.4 per 10k Residents

More Officers per Population than 17% of Depts

Police violence i

48% -5%

Open in New Window

Deadly Force

4 Killings by Police from 2013-21  |  4.6 every 10k arrests

^  More Killings by Police per Arrest than 98% of Depts   

Deadly Force by Armed Status

N/A Unarmed  |  75% Did Not Allegedly Have a Gun

Unarmed Other Alleged Gun Vehicle
75%
25%

^  More Unarmed People Killed per Arrest than N/A of Depts   

Open in New Window

Police Violence by Race

Black Latinx N.Am API Other White

Population of Flint

53%
37%

Flint Police Dept Demographics

100%

People Arrested

69%
30%

People Killed

50%
50%

^  More Racial Disparities in Deadly Force than 9% of Depts   

Police Accountability i

29%

Total civilian complaints

N/A from  |  N/A Ruled in Favor of Civilians

No Data Found Add Data

Use of Force Complaints

N/A Reported

No Data Found Add Data

Complaints of Police Discrimination

N/A Reported  |  N/A Ruled in Favor of Civilians

No Data Found Add Data

Alleged Crimes Committed by Police

N/A Reported  |  N/A Ruled in Favor of Civilians

No Data Found Add Data

Approach to Law Enforcement i

69% -2%

Arrests By Year

8,691 Arrests Reported from 2013-2021

Low Level Arrests Other Arrests

More Info

Arrests for Low Level Offenses

3,785 Arrests  |  5 per 1k residents

^  Higher Arrest Rate for Low Level Offenses than 4% of Depts   

Disparities in Arrests for Low Level Offenses by Race/Ethnicity

to be arrested for low level, non-violent offenses than a white person.

Black Latinx White

Percent of total arrests by type

All Arrests for Low Level Offenses ( 44% )

Drug Possession ( 8% )

Violent Crime ( 17% )

Open in New Window

Homicides Unsolved

337 Homicides from 2013-21  |  301 Unsolved

^  Solved Fewer Homicides than 3% of Depts   

Percent of Homicides Unsolved by Race

Homicides of Black Victims Unsolved ( 57% )

Homicides of White Victims Unsolved ( 56% )

Michigan Police Department Scores

Rankings are based upon a 0 to 100 percentage scale. Departments with higher scores use less force, make fewer arrests for low level offenses, solve murder cases more often, hold officers more accountable and spend less on policing overall.

Overall Scores for Depts where We Have Obtained the Most Data.

Grade Scale Tap "show more" to see extended list

Police Department Score 5YR
3. Lansing 42% +4%
2. Detroit 46% -10%
1. Livonia 49% +5%
* Mackinaw City 34% -2%
* Kalamazoo Department Of Public Safety 35% -3%
* Grosse Pointe Shores 35% -1%
* Trenton 38% +8%
* Bridgman 38% +2%
+12%
+3%
+3%
-1%
-2%
-3%
+3%
+5%
-4%
-12%
-2%
+6%
-1%
-3%
+2%
-5%
+3%
+3%
+3%
+1%
+3%
-3%
+1%
+12%
+3%
+2%
+3%
+2%
+1%
+7%
+13%
+2%
+1%
+2%
+2%
+3%
+2%
+2%
+5%
+2%
+2%
+3%
+6%
+3%
-8%
+2%
+17%
+2%
+14%
+12%
-3%
+1%
+1%
+1%
+1%
-1%
+1%
+4%
+1%
-5%
-2%
+1%
+5%
+5%
+3%
+2%
+3%
+3%
-2%
+5%
-2%
+3%
+3%
-1%
+16%
-1%
+12%
-2%
-3%
+5%
+2%
+1%
+7%
+2%
+5%
+3%
-1%
+4%
-3%
+4%
-1%
+6%
-1%
-2%
+5%
+3%
-1%
+4%
+2%
+1%
+2%
-1%
+2%
+2%
+9%
-3%
-1%
+3%
+3%
-1%
-8%
-4%
-3%
+10%
+9%
+6%
+7%
+2%
+2%
+5%
-1%
-2%
+2%
+8%
-3%
+1%
+1%
-6%
-2%
+3%
-9%
-2%
-2%
-2%
-2%
+1%
-2%
-5%
+5%
+1%
+6%
+6%
+3%
+6%
+7%
+3%
+5%
+5%
+3%
-1%
+2%
-3%
+1%
+7%
+4%
-3%
+1%
-8%
-1%
-5%
-5%
-3%
+7%
-2%
Police Department Score 5YR
* Richfield Township 48% -4%
* Columbia Township 48% +6%
* Peck 48% -1%
* Grant 48% -1%
* Quincy 48% +2%
* Union City 48% -4%
* Denmark Township 48% -3%
* Benona Township Hart 48% -3%
-3%
-3%
+4%
-2%
-3%
-3%
+1%
-1%
-1%
+3%
+4%
+6%
-3%
-1%
-3%
-3%
-2%
-7%
-1%
-3%
-2%
-3%
+2%
-3%
+3%
-16%
-3%
-1%
-3%
-3%
-3%
-3%
-3%
-3%
+8%
-12%
-3%
+3%
-2%
-5%
-2%
-1%
-7%
+5%
-3%
-2%
+5%
+2%
-1%
+12%
-2%
-6%
-2%
+4%
-1%
+4%
+7%
+8%
+5%
-4%
+2%
+1%
-1%
+7%
-2%
+6%
-2%
+3%
-3%
+3%
+1%
-8%
-3%
+1%
-3%
-2%
+1%
-3%
-3%
-4%
+1%
-6%
-2%
+4%
-9%
+2%
+14%
+3%
+7%
-3%
+3%
-4%
+10%
+1%
-3%
-1%
+2%
-3%
-2%
-3%
-4%
-3%
-3%
-3%
-3%
-5%
-3%
-3%
-3%
-12%
-8%
-4%
+2%
-3%
-2%
+5%
+2%
-3%
+2%
-3%
-5%
-2%
-4%
-2%
-10%
-7%
+2%
+4%
+6%
-3%
+6%
+4%
-3%
-3%
+4%
-7%
+2%
+9%
+1%
-4%
-4%
-10%
+4%
-2%
+6%
-1%
+10%
+2%
+6%
-4%
-3%
+2%
+1%
-6%
-4%
-12%
-2%
+2%
-4%
-2%
+1%
+2%
-1%
+1%
+2%
+1%
-5%
-3%
-2%
+6%
+9%
-2%
+2%
-3%
-2%
-2%
-1%
-3%
+1%
+2%
-3%
-10%
-2%
+2%
-6%
-1%
-9%
-7%
-10%
-9%
-13%
-2%
+7%
+8%
+2%
-3%
+3%
+5%
+1%
+1%
-1%
+5%
+7%
-11%

* An asterisk indicates this location did not publish enough data to evaluate. Click below to add data to the Scorecard.

About This Scorecard

This is the first nationwide evaluation of policing in the United States. It was built using data from state and federal databases, public records requests to local police departments, and media reports. While police data is never perfect, and there are additional indicators that still need to be tracked, the Police Scorecard is designed to provide insight into many important issues in policing.

 

Police Scorecard is an independent 501(c)(3) organization, learn more about our team here. If you have feedback, questions about the project, or need support with an advocacy campaign, contact our Founder, Samuel Sinyangwe.

methodology Source Data

 

Use this Scorecard to identify issues within police departments that require the most urgent interventions and hold officials accountable for implementing solutions. For example, cities with higher rates of low level arrests could benefit most from solutions that create alternatives to policing and arrest for these offenses. In cities where police make fewer arrests overall but use more force when making arrests, communities could benefit significantly from policies designed to hold police accountable for excessive force. And cities where complaints of police misconduct are rarely ruled in favor of civilians could benefit from creating an oversight structure to independently investigate these complaints.

 

Here's how to start pushing for change

  • Contact your Mayor and Police Chief, share your scorecard with them and urge them to enact policies to address the issues you've identified:
    Advocacy Tip:  We've identified problematic language in this city's police union contract that could make it harder to hold officers accountable. Learn more about this contract and how to change it at Nixthe6.org.
  • Look up your state and federal representatives below, then tell them to take action to hold police accountable in your community.