This agency did not reportedly kill anyone from 2013-20.
We obtained data on 593 Michigan police departments.
Scorecard at a Glance
Average for 4 Sections: 55%
Scores range from 0-100% comparing cities with 50-100k population. Cities with higher scores spend less on policing, use less force, are more likely to hold officers accountable and make fewer arrests for low-level offenses.
|Police Funding: 52%|
|Police Budget Cost per Person|
|Police Presence/Over-Policing (Officers per Population)|
|Police Violence: 71%|
|Force Used per Arrest|
|Deadly Force per Arrest|
|Unarmed Victims of Deadly Force per Arrest|
|Racial Disparities in Deadly Force|
|Police Accountability: 17%|
|Misconduct Complaints Upheld|
|Excessive Force Complaints Upheld|
|Discrimination Complaints Upheld|
|Criminal Misconduct Complaints Upheld|
|Approach to Law Enforcement: 83%|
|Arrest Rate for Low Level Offenses|
|Racial Disparities in Drug Arrests|
N/A Killings by Police
56 civilian complaints of police misconduct
9% were ruled in favor of civilians from 2014-20.
11,313 arrests made
69% of all arrests were for low-level, non-violent offenses from 2013-20.
Police Funding By Year
$19.39M | $239 per Resident
More Police Funding per Capita than 40% of Depts
Funds taken from communities in fines and forfeitures
Total: $22.12M from 2010-19
Number of officers per 1k population
106 Officers | 12 per 10k Residents
More Officers per Population than 27% of Depts
Used More Force per Arrest than 16% of Depts
41 Incidents | 36 every 10k arrests | ▶-50%
Police Violence by Race
Population of Farmington Hills
Farmington Hills Police Dept Demographics
Total civilian complaints
56 from 2014-20 | 9% Ruled in Favor of Civilians
Use of Force Complaints
15 Reported | 0% Ruled in Favor of Civilians
Arrests By Year
11,313 Arrests Reported from 2013-2020
Arrests for Low Level Offenses
7,827 Arrests | 14 per 1k residents
^ Higher Arrest Rate for Low Level Offenses than 29% of Depts
Percent of total arrests by type
All Arrests for Low Level Offenses ( 69% )
Drug Possession ( 13% )
Violent Crime ( 3% )
2 Homicides from 2013-19 | 0 Unsolved
Michigan Police Department Scores
Rankings are based upon a 0 to 100 percentage scale. Departments with higher scores use less force, make fewer arrests for low level offenses, solve murder cases more often, hold officers more accountable and spend less on policing overall.
Overall Scores for Depts where We Have Obtained the Most Data.
Tap "show more" to see extended list
* An asterisk indicates this location did not publish enough data to evaluate. Click below to add data to the Scorecard.
About This Scorecard
This is the first nationwide evaluation of policing in the United States. It was built using data from state and federal databases, public records requests to local police departments, and media reports. While police data is never perfect, and there are additional indicators that still need to be tracked, the Police Scorecard is designed to provide insight into many important issues in policing.
Use this Scorecard to identify issues within police departments that require the most urgent interventions and hold officials accountable for implementing solutions. For example, cities with higher rates of low level arrests could benefit most from solutions that create alternatives to policing and arrest for these offenses. In cities where police make fewer arrests overall but use more force when making arrests, communities could benefit significantly from policies designed to hold police accountable for excessive force. And cities where complaints of police misconduct are rarely ruled in favor of civilians could benefit from creating an oversight structure to independently investigate these complaints.
Here's how to start pushing for change
Contact your Mayor and Police Chief, share your scorecard with them and urge them to enact policies to address the issues you've identified:
Look up your state and federal representatives below, then tell them to take action to hold police accountable in your community.
Join a team of researchers, students, data scientists, activists and organizers working to collect, analyze and use data for justice and accountability.
Create data visualizations and content that raises awareness about solutions to the issues identified by the data.
If you have feedback, questions about the project, or need support with an advocacy campaign, contact our Project Lead, Samuel Sinyangwe.
Step 1: COMPLETED
Obtain data on 100 California cities. Refine methodology in response to feedback from communities, researchers and local officials.
Step 2: COMPLETED
Expand to every major law enforcement agency in America and include additional indicators such as police budgets and jail incarceration.
Step 3: IN PROGRESS
Inform data-driven solutions nationwide. Update as new federal, state and local data are collected. Track progress and hold cities accountable to results.