That's a higher rate than 88% of US Police Departments.
We obtained data on 83 Arizona police departments.
* An asterisk indicates that this location has not provided enough data to be included in our rankings. We are still working to obtain comprehensive data from every jurisdiction in the nation.
Scorecard at a Glance
Average for 4 Sections: 46%
Scores range from 0-100% comparing cities with under 50k population. Cities with higher scores spend less on policing, use less force, are more likely to hold officers accountable and make fewer arrests for low-level offenses.
|Police Funding: 59%|
|Police Budget Cost per Person|
|Police Presence/Over-Policing (Officers per Population)|
|Police Violence: 41%|
|Force Used per Arrest|
|Deadly Force per Arrest|
|Unarmed Victims of Deadly Force per Arrest|
|Racial Disparities in Deadly Force|
|Police Accountability: 29%|
|Misconduct Complaints Upheld|
|Excessive Force Complaints Upheld|
|Discrimination Complaints Upheld|
|Criminal Misconduct Complaints Upheld|
|Approach to Law Enforcement: 54%|
|Arrest Rate for Low Level Offenses|
|Racial Disparities in Drug Arrests|
2 Killings by Police
N/A civilian complaints of police misconduct
No civilian complaints data obtained for this agency.
15,113 arrests made
61% of all arrests were for low-level, non-violent offenses from 2013-21.
Police Funding By Year
$16.71M | 42,800 Residents | $390 per Resident
More Police Funding per Capita than 88% of Depts
Number of officers per 1k population
58 Officers | 13.6 per 10k Residents
More Officers per Population than 19% of Depts
2 Killings by Police from 2013-21 | 1.2 every 10k arrests
^ More Killings by Police per Arrest than 88% of Depts
Deadly Force by Armed Status
N/A Unarmed | 100% Did Not Allegedly Have a Gun
^ More Unarmed People Killed per Arrest than N/A of Depts
Police Violence by Race
Population of Sierra Vista
Sierra Vista Police Dept Demographics
Police Accountability i
Section Score: 29%
Total civilian complaints
N/A from | N/A Ruled in Favor of Civilians
No Data Found Add Data
Use of Force Complaints
No Data Found Add Data
Arrests By Year
15,113 Arrests Reported from 2013-2021
Arrests for Low Level Offenses
9,189 Arrests | 30 per 1k residents
^ Higher Arrest Rate for Low Level Offenses than 68% of Depts
Disparities in Arrests for Low Level Offenses by Race/Ethnicity
Black people were 1.8x more likely and Latinx people were 1x more likely to be arrested for low level, non-violent offenses than a white person.
Percent of total arrests by type
All Arrests for Low Level Offenses ( 61% )
Drug Possession ( 14% )
Violent Crime ( 3% )
14 Homicides from 2013-21 | 5 Unsolved
^ Solved Fewer Homicides than 42% of Depts
Arizona Police Department Scores
Rankings are based upon a 0 to 100 percentage scale. Departments with higher scores use less force, make fewer arrests for low level offenses, solve murder cases more often, hold officers more accountable and spend less on policing overall.
Overall Scores for Depts where We Have Obtained the Most Data.
Tap "show more" to see extended list
|15. Tempe 31%||▶-5%|
|14. Yuma 41%||▶-2%|
|13. Phoenix 41%||▶+5%|
|12. Mesa 42%||▶+2%|
|11. Tucson 42%||▶+3%|
|10. Flagstaff 43%||▶+3%|
|9. Scottsdale 44%||▶+8%|
|8. Avondale 46%||▶-6%|
|* Benson 43%||▶-1%|
|* Show Low 43%||▶-4%|
|* Chino Valley 43%||▶-6%|
|* Prescott Valley 44%||▶+6%|
|* Oro Valley 44%||▶-12%|
|* Holbrook 44%|
|* Clifton 44%||▶-4%|
|* Parker 44%||▶+10%|
* An asterisk indicates this location did not publish enough data to evaluate. Click below to add data to the Scorecard.
About This Scorecard
This is the first nationwide evaluation of policing in the United States. It was built using data from state and federal databases, public records requests to local police departments, and media reports. While police data is never perfect, and there are additional indicators that still need to be tracked, the Police Scorecard is designed to provide insight into many important issues in policing.
Police Scorecard is an independent 501(c)(3) organization, learn more about our team here. If you have feedback, questions about the project, or need support with an advocacy campaign, contact our Founder, Samuel Sinyangwe.
Use this Scorecard to identify issues within police departments that require the most urgent interventions and hold officials accountable for implementing solutions. For example, cities with higher rates of low level arrests could benefit most from solutions that create alternatives to policing and arrest for these offenses. In cities where police make fewer arrests overall but use more force when making arrests, communities could benefit significantly from policies designed to hold police accountable for excessive force. And cities where complaints of police misconduct are rarely ruled in favor of civilians could benefit from creating an oversight structure to independently investigate these complaints.
Here's how to start pushing for change
Contact your Mayor and Police Chief, share your scorecard with them and urge them to enact policies to address the issues you've identified:
Advocacy Tip: This state has a Police Bill of Rights law. These laws make it harder to hold police accountable. Call state legislators and tell them to repeal this law.
Look up your state and federal representatives below, then tell them to take action to hold police accountable in your community.
Join a team of researchers, students, data scientists, activists and organizers working to collect, analyze and use data for justice and accountability.
Create data visualizations and content that raises awareness about solutions to the issues identified by the data.
Step 1: COMPLETED
Obtain data on 100 California cities. Refine methodology in response to feedback from communities, researchers and local officials.
Step 2: COMPLETED
Expand to every major law enforcement agency in America and include additional indicators such as police budgets and jail incarceration.
Step 3: IN PROGRESS
Inform data-driven solutions nationwide. Update as new federal, state and local data are collected. Track progress and hold cities accountable to results.