Skip to Content

We obtained data on 139 Mississippi police departments.

  Loading Map ...
 
Police Department Gulfport
38% SCORE

Scorecard at a Glance

Average for 4 Sections: 38%

Scores range from 0-100% comparing cities with 50-100k population. Cities with higher scores spend less on policing, use less force, are more likely to hold officers accountable and make fewer arrests for low-level offenses.

Worse
50th Percentile
Better
Police Funding:  42%
Police Budget Cost per Person        
Misconduct Settlements        
Fines/Forfeitures        
Police Presence/Over-Policing (Officers per Population)        
Police Violence:  38%
Force Used per Arrest        
Deadly Force per Arrest        
Unarmed Victims of Deadly Force per Arrest        
Racial Disparities in Deadly Force        
Worse
50th Percentile
Better
Police Accountability:  29%
Misconduct Complaints Upheld        
Excessive Force Complaints Upheld        
Discrimination Complaints Upheld        
Criminal Misconduct Complaints Upheld        
Approach to Law Enforcement:  42%
Arrest Rate for Low Level Offenses        
Homicides Solved        
Racial Disparities in Drug Arrests        

Key Findings

Police Funding i

42% +4%

Police Funding By Year

$17.54M  |  $242 per Resident

More Police Funding per Capita than 43% of Depts

Funds taken from communities in fines and forfeitures

Total: $16.79M from 2010-19

Number of officers per 1k population

152 Officers  |  21.8 per 10k Residents

More Officers per Population than 87% of Depts

Police violence i

38% +24%

Open in New Window

Deadly Force

7 Killings by Police from 2013-20  |  1.6 every 10k arrests

^  More Killings by Police per Arrest than 79% of Depts   

Deadly Force by Armed Status

14% Unarmed  |  43% Did Not Allegedly Have a Gun

Unarmed Other Alleged Gun Vehicle
14%
28%
57%

^  More Unarmed People Killed per Arrest than 72% of Depts   

Open in New Window

Police Violence by Race

Black Latinx N.Am API Other White

Population of Jurisdiction

36%
53%

Police Department Demographics

10%
90%

People Arrested

62%
44%

People Killed

57%
14%
29%

^  More Racial Disparities in Deadly Force than 48% of Depts   

Police Accountability i

29%

Total civilian complaints

N/A from  |  N/A Ruled in Favor of Civilians

No Data Found Add Data

Use of Force Complaints

N/A Reported

No Data Found Add Data

Complaints of Police Discrimination

N/A Reported  |  N/A Ruled in Favor of Civilians

No Data Found Add Data

Alleged Crimes Committed by Police

N/A Reported  |  N/A Ruled in Favor of Civilians

No Data Found Add Data

Approach to Law Enforcement i

42% -17%

Arrests By Year

38,816 Arrests Reported from 2013-19

More Info

Arrests for Low Level Offenses

25,496 Arrests  |  50 per 1k residents

^  Higher Arrest Rate for Low Level Offenses than 94% of Depts   

Percent of total arrests by type

All Arrests for Low Level Offenses ( 66% )

Drug Possession ( 20% )

Violent Crime ( 2% )

Open in New Window

Homicides Unsolved

59 Homicides from 2013-19  |  25 Unsolved

^  Solved Fewer Homicides than 26% of Depts   

Percent of Homicides Unsolved by Race

Homicides of Black Victims Unsolved ( 32% )

Homicides of White Victims Unsolved ( 10% )

Mississippi Police Department Scores

Rankings are based upon a 0 to 100 percentage scale. Departments with higher scores use less force, make fewer arrests for low level offenses, solve murder cases more often, hold officers more accountable and spend less on policing overall.

Overall Scores for Depts where We Have Obtained the Most Data.

Grade Scale Tap "show more" to see extended list

Police Department Score 5YR
2. Gulfport 38% +3%
1. Jackson 47% -1%
* Brookhaven 35% -1%
* Louisville 35% -2%
* Morton 35% +6%
* Ridgeland 36%
* Pascagoula 36% -10%
* Oxford 37% -20%
-4%
+1%
-2%
+9%
-4%
-4%
+1%
+3%
-5%
-6%
-4%
+24%
+6%
+7%
+2%
-4%
-5%
-1%
+17%
-1%
+3%
+3%
+6%
+5%
+1%
+2%
+2%
-2%
-2%
+6%
-9%
+2%
-1%
+1%
+5%
+3%
+8%
+2%
+4%
+8%
-2%
-4%
-8%
-6%
-3%
+2%
+2%
+1%
+3%
-2%
-1%
+2%
-6%
-7%
+4%
-5%
-1%
-5%
Police Department Score 5YR
* D'iberville 44% -1%
* Collins 44% -2%
* Inverness 44% +3%
* Ackerman 44% -5%
* Sunflower 45%
* Drew 45% +6%
* Port Gibson 45% +3%
* Coldwater 45% +2%
+2%
-11%
+2%
+7%
+3%
+2%
+5%
+4%
+1%
+8%
+1%
+9%
+1%
+3%
+3%
+9%
+2%
+4%
+11%
+1%
+6%
+2%
+8%
-5%
+10%
-3%
+7%
+3%
-1%
+9%
+2%
+9%
-2%
+1%
+3%
+5%
+4%
-3%
+4%
+1%
+2%
+7%
+11%
+8%
+9%
+6%
+3%
+9%
+4%
+4%
+4%
-4%
+6%
+8%
+8%
-2%
-3%

* An asterisk indicates this location did not publish enough data to evaluate. Click below to add data to the Scorecard.

About This Scorecard

This is the first nationwide evaluation of policing in the United States. It was built using data from state and federal databases, public records requests to local police departments, and media reports. While police data is never perfect, and there are additional indicators that still need to be tracked, the Police Scorecard is designed to provide insight into many important issues in policing.

methodology Source Data

 

Use this Scorecard to identify issues within police departments that require the most urgent interventions and hold officials accountable for implementing solutions. For example, cities with higher rates of low level arrests could benefit most from solutions that create alternatives to policing and arrest for these offenses. In cities where police make fewer arrests overall but use more force when making arrests, communities could benefit significantly from policies designed to hold police accountable for excessive force. And cities where complaints of police misconduct are rarely ruled in favor of civilians could benefit from creating an oversight structure to independently investigate these complaints.

 

Here's how to start pushing for change

  • Contact your Mayor and Police Chief, share your scorecard with them and urge them to enact policies to address the issues you've identified:
  • Look up your state and federal representatives below, then tell them to take action to hold police accountable in your community.

 

If you have feedback, questions about the project, or need support with an advocacy campaign, contact our Project Lead, Samuel Sinyangwe.