That's a higher rate than 34% of US Police Departments.
We obtained data on 166 Oregon police departments.
Scorecard at a Glance
Average for 4 Sections: 46%
Scores range from 0-100% comparing cities with 100-250k population. Cities with higher scores spend less on policing, use less force, are more likely to hold officers accountable and make fewer arrests for low-level offenses.
Police Funding: 51% | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Police Budget Cost per Person | ||||
Misconduct Settlements | ||||
Fines/Forfeitures | ||||
Police Presence/Over-Policing (Officers per Population) |
Police Violence: 41% | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Force Used per Arrest | ||||
Deadly Force per Arrest | ||||
Unarmed Victims of Deadly Force per Arrest | ||||
Racial Disparities in Deadly Force |
Police Accountability: 48% | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Misconduct Complaints Upheld | ||||
Excessive Force Complaints Upheld | ||||
Discrimination Complaints Upheld | ||||
Criminal Misconduct Complaints Upheld |
Approach to Law Enforcement: 43% | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Arrest Rate for Low Level Offenses | ||||
Homicides Solved | ||||
Racial Disparities in Drug Arrests |
Key Findings
5 Killings by Police
160 civilian complaints of police misconduct
43% were ruled in favor of civilians from 2016-18.
60,987 arrests made
66% of all arrests were for low-level, non-violent offenses from 2013-21.
Police Funding By Year
$62.1M | 174,513 Residents | $365 per Resident
More Police Funding per Capita than 69% of Depts
Source: US Census Bureau
Number of officers per 1k population
187 Officers | 10.7 per 10k Residents
More Officers per Population than 21% of Depts
Source: Federal LEOKA Database
Police Shootings
More Police Shootings per Arrest than 32% of Depts
11 Shootings | 1.8 every 100k arrests
Less-Lethal Force
Used More Force per Arrest than 69% of Depts
569 Incidents | 122 every 10k arrests | ▶+43%
Source: Police Department
Deadly Force
5 Killings by Police from 2013-21 | 0.7 every 10k arrests
^ More Killings by Police per Arrest than 34% of Depts
Source: Mapping Police Violence
Deadly Force by Armed Status
20% Unarmed | 20% Did Not Allegedly Have a Gun
^ More Unarmed People Killed per Arrest than 58% of Depts
Police Violence by Race
Population of Eugene
Eugene Police Dept Demographics
People Arrested
People Killed
^ More Racial Disparities in Deadly Force than 78% of Depts
Source: Uniform Crime Report, Mapping Police Violence, LEMAS
Total civilian complaints
160 from 2016-18 | 43% Ruled in Favor of Civilians
Use of Force Complaints
12 Reported | 8% Ruled in Favor of Civilians
Complaints of Police Discrimination
4 Reported | 0% Ruled in Favor of Civilians
Alleged Crimes Committed by Police
12 Reported | 17% Ruled in Favor of Civilians
Arrests By Year
60,987 Arrests Reported from 2013-2021
Arrests for Low Level Offenses
40,459 Arrests | 33 per 1k residents
^ Higher Arrest Rate for Low Level Offenses than 83% of Depts
Disparities in Arrests for Low Level Offenses by Race/Ethnicity
Black people were 4.7x more likely and Latinx people were 0.4x more likely to be arrested for low level, non-violent offenses than a white person.
Percent of total arrests by type
All Arrests for Low Level Offenses ( 66% )
Drug Possession ( 13% )
Violent Crime ( 5% )
Homicides Unsolved
26 Homicides from 2013-21 | 7 Unsolved
^ Solved Fewer Homicides than 48% of Depts
Percent of Homicides Unsolved by Race
Homicides of White Victims Unsolved ( 5% )
Oregon Police Department Scores
Rankings are based upon a 0 to 100 percentage scale. Departments with higher scores use less force, make fewer arrests for low level offenses, solve murder cases more often, hold officers more accountable and spend less on policing overall.
Overall Scores for Depts where We Have Obtained the Most Data.
Tap "show more" to see extended list
Police Department | Score | 5YR |
---|---|---|
4. Salem 42% | ▶-15% | |
3. Portland Bureau 45% | ▶-8% | |
2. Eugene 46% | ▶-10% | |
1. Hillsboro 50% | ▶-8% | |
* Seaside 31% | ▶+11% | |
* Milwaukie 36% | ▶+8% | |
* Reedsport 38% | ▶-2% | |
* Gold Beach 38% | ▶-6% | |
▶-1% | ||
▶-5% | ||
▶-5% | ||
▶-6% | ||
▶-2% | ||
▶+5% | ||
▶-7% | ||
▶+10% | ||
▶-8% | ||
▶+4% | ||
▶-2% | ||
▶-7% | ||
▶-4% | ||
▶+3% | ||
▶+3% | ||
▶+1% | ||
▶-9% | ||
▶-1% | ||
▶+5% | ||
▶-3% | ||
▶-2% | ||
▶-3% | ||
▶-1% | ||
▶-8% | ||
▶-6% | ||
▶-8% | ||
▶-14% | ||
▶+2% | ||
▶+1% | ||
▶+1% | ||
▶+1% | ||
▶+2% | ||
▶+2% | ||
▶-1% | ||
▶+7% | ||
▶-8% | ||
▶+1% | ||
▶-2% | ||
▶-5% | ||
▶+10% | ||
▶-1% | ||
▶+3% | ||
▶-1% | ||
▶+3% | ||
▶+1% | ||
▶-3% | ||
▶-4% | ||
▶+1% | ||
▶+2% | ||
▶+3% | ||
▶+3% | ||
▶+10% | ||
▶-5% | ||
▶-2% | ||
▶-2% | ||
▶+1% | ||
▶-9% | ||
▶-2% | ||
▶-4% | ||
▶-3% | ||
▶-9% | ||
▶-1% | ||
▶+2% | ||
▶+5% | ||
▶+8% | ||
▶-2% |
Police Department | Score | 5YR |
---|---|---|
* Troutdale 48% | ▶-2% | |
* Silverton 48% | ▶-7% | |
* Athena 48% | ▶-2% | |
* Florence 48% | ▶+2% | |
* Milton Freewater 48% | ▶-2% | |
* Warrenton 48% | ||
* Creswell 48% | ▶-3% | |
* Jefferson 48% | ▶-3% | |
▶+2% | ||
▶-2% | ||
▶-3% | ||
▶-3% | ||
▶+1% | ||
▶-1% | ||
▶-1% | ||
▶-7% | ||
▶+1% | ||
▶-2% | ||
▶-2% | ||
▶+6% | ||
▶+6% | ||
▶-1% | ||
▶-4% | ||
▶-2% | ||
▶-2% | ||
▶-2% | ||
▶-3% | ||
▶-4% | ||
▶+2% | ||
▶+4% | ||
▶+6% | ||
▶-6% | ||
▶-10% | ||
▶-3% | ||
▶-4% | ||
▶+4% | ||
▶+12% | ||
▶+1% | ||
▶-14% | ||
▶-3% | ||
▶-3% | ||
▶-3% | ||
▶+5% | ||
▶+5% | ||
▶-1% | ||
▶-3% | ||
▶-6% | ||
▶-3% | ||
▶+4% | ||
▶-6% | ||
▶-1% | ||
▶+3% | ||
▶+5% | ||
▶-5% | ||
▶+8% | ||
▶-6% | ||
▶-1% | ||
▶+4% | ||
▶-2% | ||
▶-1% | ||
▶-8% | ||
▶+7% | ||
▶-1% | ||
▶+1% | ||
▶-3% | ||
▶+1% | ||
▶+3% | ||
▶+2% | ||
▶-3% | ||
▶+1% | ||
▶+14% | ||
▶+3% | ||
▶+1% | ||
▶+7% |
* An asterisk indicates this location did not publish enough data to evaluate. Click below to add data to the Scorecard.
About This Scorecard
This is the first nationwide evaluation of policing in the United States. It was built using data from state and federal databases, public records requests to local police departments, and media reports. While police data is never perfect, and there are additional indicators that still need to be tracked, the Police Scorecard is designed to provide insight into many important issues in policing.
Police Scorecard is an independent 501(c)(3) organization, learn more about our team here. If you have feedback, questions about the project, or need support with an advocacy campaign, contact our Founder, Samuel Sinyangwe.
Use this Scorecard to identify issues within police departments that require the most urgent interventions and hold officials accountable for implementing solutions. For example, cities with higher rates of low level arrests could benefit most from solutions that create alternatives to policing and arrest for these offenses. In cities where police make fewer arrests overall but use more force when making arrests, communities could benefit significantly from policies designed to hold police accountable for excessive force. And cities where complaints of police misconduct are rarely ruled in favor of civilians could benefit from creating an oversight structure to independently investigate these complaints.
Here's how to start pushing for change
-
Contact your Mayor and Police Chief, share your scorecard with them and urge them to enact policies to address the issues you've identified:
Advocacy Tip: Oregon state legislators are considering HR2417, a bill to invest in programs that send mental health providers to mental health issues, subsance abuse and familial conflicts instead of police. This could reduce arrests, use of force and incarceration.
-
Look up your state and federal representatives below, then tell them to take action to hold police accountable in your community.
Join a team of researchers, students, data scientists, activists and organizers working to collect, analyze and use data for justice and accountability.
Create data visualizations and content that raises awareness about solutions to the issues identified by the data.
What's Next
Step 1: COMPLETED
Obtain data on 100 California cities. Refine methodology in response to feedback from communities, researchers and local officials.
Step 2: COMPLETED
Expand to every major law enforcement agency in America and include additional indicators such as police budgets and jail incarceration.
Step 3: IN PROGRESS
Inform data-driven solutions nationwide. Update as new federal, state and local data are collected. Track progress and hold cities accountable to results.