That's a higher rate than 89% of US Police Departments.
We obtained data on 83 Idaho police departments.
* An asterisk indicates that this location has not provided enough data to be included in our rankings. We are still working to obtain comprehensive data from every jurisdiction in the nation.
Scorecard at a Glance
Average for 4 Sections: 50%
Scores range from 0-100% comparing cities with 50-100k population. Cities with higher scores spend less on policing, use less force, are more likely to hold officers accountable and make fewer arrests for low-level offenses.
|Police Funding: 76%|
|Police Budget Cost per Person|
|Police Presence/Over-Policing (Officers per Population)|
|Police Violence: 40%|
|Force Used per Arrest|
|Deadly Force per Arrest|
|Unarmed Victims of Deadly Force per Arrest|
|Racial Disparities in Deadly Force|
|Police Accountability: 30%|
|Misconduct Complaints Upheld|
|Excessive Force Complaints Upheld|
|Discrimination Complaints Upheld|
|Criminal Misconduct Complaints Upheld|
|Approach to Law Enforcement: 52%|
|Arrest Rate for Low Level Offenses|
|Racial Disparities in Drug Arrests|
4 Killings by Police
N/A civilian complaints of police misconduct
No civilian complaints data obtained for this agency.
14,976 arrests made
65% of all arrests were for low-level, non-violent offenses from 2013-21.
Police Funding By Year
$9.38M | 59,987 Residents | $156 per Resident
More Police Funding per Capita than 5% of Depts
Source: US Census Bureau
Number of officers per 1k population
73 Officers | 12.2 per 10k Residents
More Officers per Population than 27% of Depts
Source: Federal LEOKA Database
4 Killings by Police from 2013-21 | 2.4 every 10k arrests
^ More Killings by Police per Arrest than 89% of Depts
Source: Mapping Police Violence
Deadly Force by Armed Status
N/A Unarmed | 25% Did Not Allegedly Have a Gun
^ More Unarmed People Killed per Arrest than N/A of Depts
Police Violence by Race
Population of Caldwell
Caldwell Police Dept Demographics
Source: Uniform Crime Report, Mapping Police Violence, LEMAS
Police Accountability i
Section Score: 30%
Total civilian complaints
N/A from | N/A Ruled in Favor of Civilians
No Data Found Add Data
Use of Force Complaints
No Data Found Add Data
Approach to Law Enforcement i
Section Score: 52% ▶+17%
Source: Uniform Crime Report
Arrests By Year
14,976 Arrests Reported from 2013-2021
Arrests for Low Level Offenses
9,781 Arrests | 23 per 1k residents
^ Higher Arrest Rate for Low Level Offenses than 59% of Depts
Disparities in Arrests for Low Level Offenses by Race/Ethnicity
Black people were 7.4x more likely and Latinx people were 0.8x more likely to be arrested for low level, non-violent offenses than a white person.
Percent of total arrests by type
All Arrests for Low Level Offenses ( 65% )
Drug Possession ( 17% )
Violent Crime ( 4% )
3 Homicides from 2013-21 | 0 Unsolved
No Unsolved Homicides Reported
Idaho Police Department Scores
Rankings are based upon a 0 to 100 percentage scale. Departments with higher scores use less force, make fewer arrests for low level offenses, solve murder cases more often, hold officers more accountable and spend less on policing overall.
Overall Scores for Depts where We Have Obtained the Most Data.
Tap "show more" to see extended list
|2. Boise 56%||▶-9%|
|1. Nampa 56%||▶-5%|
|* Homedale 35%||▶-1%|
|* Sandpoint 38%||▶+6%|
|* Garden City 39%||▶+1%|
|* Couer D'alene 41%||▶-4%|
|* Mccall 42%||▶+5%|
|* Bonners Ferry 42%||▶-5%|
|* Ammon Idaho Falls 47%||▶-5%|
|* Gooding 48%|
|* Kamiah 48%||▶-5%|
|* St. Anthony 48%||▶-9%|
|* Ucon 49%||▶-3%|
|* Aberdeen 49%|
|* Malad City 49%|
|* Arco 49%||▶-5%|
* An asterisk indicates this location did not publish enough data to evaluate. Click below to add data to the Scorecard.
About This Scorecard
This is the first nationwide evaluation of policing in the United States. It was built using data from state and federal databases, public records requests to local police departments, and media reports. While police data is never perfect, and there are additional indicators that still need to be tracked, the Police Scorecard is designed to provide insight into many important issues in policing.
Police Scorecard is an independent 501(c)(3) organization, learn more about our team here. If you have feedback, questions about the project, or need support with an advocacy campaign, contact our Founder, Samuel Sinyangwe.
Use this Scorecard to identify issues within police departments that require the most urgent interventions and hold officials accountable for implementing solutions. For example, cities with higher rates of low level arrests could benefit most from solutions that create alternatives to policing and arrest for these offenses. In cities where police make fewer arrests overall but use more force when making arrests, communities could benefit significantly from policies designed to hold police accountable for excessive force. And cities where complaints of police misconduct are rarely ruled in favor of civilians could benefit from creating an oversight structure to independently investigate these complaints.
Here's how to start pushing for change
Contact your Mayor and Police Chief, share your scorecard with them and urge them to enact policies to address the issues you've identified:
Look up your state and federal representatives below, then tell them to take action to hold police accountable in your community.
Join a team of researchers, students, data scientists, activists and organizers working to collect, analyze and use data for justice and accountability.
Create data visualizations and content that raises awareness about solutions to the issues identified by the data.
Step 1: COMPLETED
Obtain data on 100 California cities. Refine methodology in response to feedback from communities, researchers and local officials.
Step 2: COMPLETED
Expand to every major law enforcement agency in America and include additional indicators such as police budgets and jail incarceration.
Step 3: IN PROGRESS
Inform data-driven solutions nationwide. Update as new federal, state and local data are collected. Track progress and hold cities accountable to results.